Fourth International Literature Festival Berlin 21st September – 2nd October, 2004
This year South Africa is celebrating ten years of democracy. And the country is swarming with foreign journalists, film makers, writers and academics doing the Ten-Year-Democracy story.
One tries not to be cynical about their enthusiasm.
Of course there is nothing like a tattered miracle, or a fake reconciliation to get the journalistic juices flowing. Expose the fraud! Go to the poorest of the poor and show up the double talk of the new black elite and the racist Afrikaner rogues. In stead of asking the hard questions about America and the European Union, it is easier to fly to Africa where the goodies are still good and the baddies still bad. Especially when the weather is warm and the wine fragrant.
This past year many of us, important and unimportant South Africans, were booked back to back with interviews and discussion programmes. I remember waiting to be interviewed on an Irish radio station in the same smart hotel that Bill Clinton stayed. The team had just returned from Houtbay – a coastal village near Cape Town that has a particular high density of squatters and posh luxurious homes with breath taking views. The interviewer looked wild. He was pacing the room angrily while his assistants were getting the sound systems ready.
He stopped in front of me. “How can it be?” he asked furiously, “I interview this black woman, living in a shack in appalling conditions, illiterate, dirt poor, I ask her: ‘what did forgiveness and ten years of democracy brought you?’ She said: ‘freedom and peace.’ I said: ‘but here you are, see how you live, you have nothing, a few yards from here, look at that mansion and the rich whites there.’ And you know what she said? She looked at me and said: ‘ten years cannot put right what three hundred years made wrong.’ This is what she said. I can’t believe it. Is she mad? Is she stupid?”
He looked at me accusingly as if I know some secret evil way that forces poor black people to give smart answers. When he mentioned that another radio team was lining up to interview that same woman again I was suddenly wondering by myself: if the fourth or fifth white pushes a microphone into my face and asks with undisguised disgust: how can you talk about forgiveness if you still have nothing and the whites still have everything… sooner or later I would definitely say: ‘You know, I am ashamed. I made a big mistake. It was so stupid to forgive. Come to think of it, I actually hate whites.’
As the foreign journalists waded their way through the country it seemed that they were more shocked about the peacefulness of the poverty than by the poverty itself. And if you listen to their encounters you realised that they made many black people feel ashamed that they had forgiven and were trying to reconcile.
The inability of whites to recognise a worldview that may be superior to theirs, is nothing new in Africa. Let me read you a poem recorded from the /Xam in the nineteenth century. /Xam is a subgroup of the Bushmen or San people. The poem says: like you read books, we read our bodies for knowledge We can feel the whole cosmos vibrating through our bodies. The Bushmen or San chose a different way of being. The chose to live lightly on the earth. The only things they left behind were stories and songs, paintings and engravings of exquisite beauty in which man, earth, animal and rain melt into oracles of a committed interwoven-ness. Yet, the Bushmen were hunted like animals by whites. They were slaughtered to become trophies.
the alphabet of the bushmen is written in our bodies
the letters talk and vibrate
the letters move the body of the bushmen if your ribs start palpitating take your arrows because you have already seen the springbuck with your body you feel the sensation of blood on your thighs and calves as if you are already carrying the springbuck home on your back as if the springbuck is already bleeding down your thighs
that is why I always wait silently for the words of my body I feel on my skull if they cut off the horns of the hartebees I feel in my feet if they are moving around the hut
we lie down in front of our shelters we lie down on the stretched out slopes of the hills it looks as if we are sleeping as if we are taking a nap
but we are reading our bodies we read everything which is moving on the plains down below the holes in the back of our knees tingle and then we wait and then everything comes to us.
(AFRIKAANS LULLABY FROM CASETTE/CD)
schlafe sanft schlafe ganz
schlafe schwarz geneigt draußen kreist die Erde so ah und du
so weich gewandet in Blau
laß Wind deine Nasenlöcher erobern laß Feuer laß Regen deine Haut erobern
Kindchen schwarz Kindchen Grasland
Kindchen niemand an nichts je gehalten
Kindchen Brust Kindchen Durst
The notion that it is a shame to forgive started as far back as the truth commission process.
I remember how an Australian academic cornered me at one of the human rights violation hearings, her eyes burning with anger: “What a terrible thing you whites have done to blacks by bulldozing them into accepting this truth and reconciliation bullshit.
“What you are doing now is worse than apartheid. You have conned and manipulated black people into accepting this without a single riot or incident of mass resistance.” That she was perhaps insulting a group of people who have just overthrown the very powerful apartheid regime didn’t seem to enter her mind.
Since then this remark of being conned into forgiving became flanked by another kind of remark. A television producer from Tel Aviv said to me last year: “By God, what a remarkable process. I am here to make a documentary of it all. Pity it could never work in Israel, because you need to be Christian to make it work.”
Two years before, an Irish journalist confessed to me with tears in his eyes: “Truly a remarkable process. Pity it wouldn’
t work in Ireland -too many Catholics you know.”
At a recent conference on the influence of violence on language, a US journalist remarked: “It is wonderful that black South Africans could forgive, but as a world power we Americans have the responsibility to uphold right and wrong.”
So everyone has found their own reason why they need to kill others. The truth and reconciliation thing is good for black third world people, but us Catholics/Christians/Muslims/Americans/Jews/Palestinians, we do it, not only differently, but better.
The list of people questioning the whole act of forgiveness and reconciliation in South Africa is quite impressive.
Professor Mahmood Mamdani, teaching at the University of Cape Town during the TRC process suggested at the time: reconciliation means an embrace of evil.
One of the top commentators on reconciliation in Holland, Professor Afshin Ellian, agrees with Nietzsche that to forget (in order to forgive) is a primitive unhistorical act -one must become “wie ein Tier”.
Jacques Derrida says: “Forgiveness is thus mad. It must plunge, but lucidly, into the night of the unintelligible.” Elsewhere Derrida says: “Forgiveness should not be normal, normative, normalising -it should remain exceptional and more or less impossible.”
In his essay on forgiveness, Derrida goes so far as to say that Tutu “with as much goodwill as confusion … introduced the vocabulary of repentance and forgiveness” to an institution “uniquely destined to treat politically motivated crimes”.
During a lecture at the University of the Western Cape, Derrida said that one could not forgive the unforgivable -unless a miracle happened.
Let me take this argument up from another angle. The cult of the individual is one of the most enduring modern myths. As in Robinson Crusoe, the Western imagination tries to create an individual who is not dependent on any community. Although Crusoe has to find a Man Friday to start a new community, the myth of the individual lives forth as the most important condition for progress. Without the individual there can be no development.
The French semiotic Dany-Robert Dufour, writes “In the present era of liberal democracy everything rests, in the final analysis, on the individual as subject – on his economic, legal, political and symbolic autonomy. Yet despite the most obsessive expressions of self-affirmation, the attempt to be oneself is fraught with difficulty. A host of symptoms testify to the “impairment of the individual” in contemporary societies. Psychic disorders, cultural malaise, the increase in violence and widescale exploitation are all vectors of new forms of alienation and inequality.’ He regards the modern individual not as free, but as lost and abandoned.
Susan Sontag’s description of the ruins of man’s thought ties in with the obsessional disregard for a community that is more than mere nationhood:
‘The best of the intellectual and creative speculation carried in the “West” over the past hundred and fifty years seems incontestably the most energetic and true in the entire lifetime of man. And yet the equally incontestable result of all this genius is our sense of standing in the ruins of thought, and on the verge of the ruins of history and of man himself… the need for individual spiritual counsel has never seemed more acute.’
Let me read you a Sesotho poem about being only an individual. It is part of a play about Senkatana. In this famous Basotho tale the dragonmonster Kodumodumo gobbled up the whole Basotho nation. That made him so enormous that he got stuck in the high mountain passes. Of all the people in the world only Senkatana survived. He was alone. He could do what he liked, he was free, but in a great voice he wailed:
I cannot find myself
because I am not among others
about what shall I be happy if I am only by myself?
from what shall I be freed if it is only me?
why would something be beautiful
if only my eyes are seeing it?
it is you who are calling forth the I
it is I who imagines himself through you
the you imagines me
I do not choose you
that you are there makes me
we have been made to be with others
or we will be hungry amidst great abundance
So here are black South Africans: on one hand accused of being manipulated, primitive, confused, a-historical and mad to forgive and reconcile; on the other hand being admired, praised and rewarded for reconciling by the very people who themselves would never contemplate doing the same.
At one stage France was donating millions to the South African Truth Commission at the very moment they were putting one of the former Second World War perpetrators, Poupon, on trial. The same America who immediately retaliated after 9/11, gave millions to the South African Truth Commission.
Why would people praise and support something they themselves would never dream of doing? Surely not because they think it is too difficult? Surely not because they thought: you know these South African blacks are superior to us. They know how to pull their people away from the destructive spiral of violence, but we westerners are too primitive to even try to do that. How else can one read it but that is smells of racism? Blacks ought to forgive, but whites should take revenge? Forgiveness is for the ‘inferior’ nations, revenge for the ‘real’ nations.
After World War Two a particular model of how to deal with horrendous injustice was put on the table of the world. It had two main legs: all victims were treated the same (the mother who lost her son fighting for apartheid testified next to the mother who lost her son fighting against apartheid. Thus acknowledging that people hurt the same) The second most important leg is to use forgiveness as a way of stopping a cycle of violence.